An Algebraic Glimpse at Bunched Implications and Separation Logic

نویسندگان

  • Peter Jipsen
  • Tadeusz Litak
چکیده

We overview the logic of Bunched Implications (BI) and Separation Logic (SL) from a perspective inspired by Hiroakira Ono’s algebraic approach to substructural logics. We propose generalized BI algebras (GBI-algebras) as a common framework for algebras arising via “declarative resource reading”, intuitionistic generalizations of relation algebras and arrow logics and the distributive Lambek calculus with intuitionistic implication. Apart from existing models of BI (in particular, heap models and effect algebras), we also cover models arising from weakening relations, formal languages or more fine-grained treatment of labelled trees and semistructured data. After briefly discussing the lattice of subvarieties of GBI, we present a suitable duality for GBI along the lines of Esakia and Priestley and an algebraic proof of cut elimination in the setting of residuated frames of Galatos and Jipsen. We also show how the algebraic approach allows generic results on decidability, both positive and negative ones. In the final part of the paper, we gently introduce the substructural audience to some theory behind state-of-art tools, culminating with an algebraic and proof-theoretic presentation of (bi-) abduction.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Stone-Type Dualities for Separation Logics

Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because — in addition to elegant abstraction — they strengthen soundness and completeness to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic treatment of Stone-type duality...

متن کامل

A Stone-Type Duality Theorem for Separation Logic via its Underlying Bunched Logics

Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because — in addition to elegant abstraction — they strengthen soundness and completeness to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic treatment of Stone-type duality...

متن کامل

A Modal Sequent Calculus for Propositional Separation Logic

In this paper, we give a sequent calculus for separation logic. Unlike the logic of bunched implications, this calculus does not have a tree-shaped context – instead, we use labelled deduction to control when hypotheses can and cannot be used. We prove that cut-elimination holds for this calculus, and show that it is sound with respect to the provability semantics of separation logic.

متن کامل

Substructural modal logic for optimal resource allocation

We introduce a substructural modal logic for reasoning about (optimal) resource allocation in models of distributed systems. The underlying logic is a variant of the modal logic of bunched implications, and based on the same resource semantics, which is itself closely related to concurrent separation logic. By considering notions of cost, strategy, and utility, we are able to formulate characte...

متن کامل

Classical Logic of Bunched Implications

We consider a classical (propositional) version, CBI, of O’Hearn and Pym’s logic of bunched implications (BI) from a modeland prooftheoretic perspective. We present a class of classical models of BI which extend the usual BI-models, based on partial commutative monoids, with an algebraic notion of “resource negation”. This class of models gives rise to natural definitions of multiplicative fals...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1709.07063  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017